what can they take away from courts?
-Crowell v. Benson (1932): agencies can adjudicate public rights, but private/common law rights adjudicated by court
-didn’t really work out but somewhat resuscitated in Granfinanciera v. Nordberg (1989) (if statutory right not closely intertwined w/ federal regulatory program and right does not belong to or against fed. govt. need article III court)
-JM finds distinction hopelessly confusing
-Thomas v. Union Carbide (1985): some Congressionally created private rights are so integrated into regulatory scheme they’re appropriate for agency adjudication
-Northern Pipeline (1982) : statute giving jurisdiction to bankruptcy justices, not Article III courts, unconstitutional because conferral of jurisdiction is very large
-So shows that Congress won’t give too much away
-Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor (1986) : agency can adjudicate common law claims pendent to agency claims
-does not violate Article III because chosen forum
-So delegation of adjudicative power okay as long as it doesn’t invade Article III
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Constitutional Law and are similar to What can be taken away from courts?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.