Connick (1983):  This case involved a government employee’s speech in a private forum about an issue of private concern.   P (an assistant DA) strongly objected to her transfer to prosecute cases is a different section of the criminal court.  She circulated a questionnaire within the office concerning transfer policies, office morale, handling grievances, employee confidence in supervisors, and pressure to work on political campaigns.  D (the DA of New Orleans and Harry Connick Jr’s dad!) terminated her supposedly because of her unwillingness to transfer (not for her speech).  Did D’s firing P violate P’s First Am. rights?