This court reaffirmed Byrd, but then say that since the movant failed to prove that the chicken was not contaminated, no summary judgment granted.  The Supreme court allowed a lay person’s testimony to prove causation.  This is not true in medical malpractice cases – there, it must be an expert testimony.  The opinion actually stated that this would not be the case in med malpractice cases; this made the medical malpractice community angry, so they had to remove it from the opinion.