Nondelegation Doctrine
Congress cannot transfer power to enact legislation to administrators or president
-Very lenientdoctrine – basically just rhetorical formalism
-just need to give meaningful standard (intelligible principle – See Touby) in statute
-only two violations of doctrine to this date (both in 1935)
-Amalgamated Meat Cutters v. Connally (D.D.C. 1971) : Pres. Nixon delegated authority (under statute) to Cost of Living Council to stabilize prices and wages
-not unconstitutional because standards [1) statute demarcated limited time period; 2) power to be exercised was general, not industry specific; 3) history of price-wage controls; 4) APA applied; 5) agency will develop standards; and 6) subject to judicial review]
-shows non-delegation doctrine isn’t much because agency had a lot of power, standard is “anything you deem appropriate” and judicial review not much
-statute had no baseline standards
-APA didn’t apply because no rules adopted
-Touby v. United States (1991) : amendment to Controlled Substances Act allowing AG to deem a drug a controlled substance if imminent hazard to public safety provided specific enough standards to be constitutional
-Whitman v. American Trucking (2001) : EPA can’t take restrictive interpretation of statute b/c that’s meaningless interpretation of non-delegation doctrine; EPA tried to be own authority by adopting rules to set out criteria for air quality levels but can’t restrict itself. Either constitutional or not and here it was.
-Agency can’t cure unlawful delegation of legislative power by adopting its discretion in limiting construction of statute – so contra Sun Ray
-DC Circuit had said that should make rules to provide accountability
-JM – Nondelegation doctrine difficult because it’s synonymous with substantive due process
-if statute too specific, may make mistake b/c agency better suited
-if too general, agency may not carry out statute as we desire
-every agency has agenda and discretion
-Sun Ray Drive-In v. Oregon Liquor Control Comm’n (Or. Ct. App. 1973) : Court cannot review facts (of denial of liquor license) because no standard for granting license – if legislature doesn’t make standards, agency must
-order vacated with instructions on commission to develop standards
-cites “common law” of agency accountability which SC in Whitman tells us doesn’t exist in federal law (but APA has common law basis)
-essentially agency makes authority legitimate – focuses on procedural due process via rule of law rather than traditional non-delegation doctrine
-Court has begged question of whether admin action is reviewable
-So compare Whitman (either valid or invalid) to Sun-Ray (cure invalidity by adopting standards)
-JM – doctrine basically non-issue but some appeal for dealing w/ accountability and rule of law claims
-some people suggest non-delegation should be used for delegation to private parties (e.g., Medicare decides insurance claims)
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Constitutional Law and are similar to What does Nondelegation Doctrine say?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
What's Your Answer to "What does Nondelegation Doctrine say?"