-Is there a legal wrong? (See Sprunt (1930) – need legal right or protected interest; didn’t have standing to challenge ICC RR rates – act not directed at him; RR not ICC was proximate cause)
-is the claimant trying to protect private rights (See Sanders Bros. (1940): Party has standing if “aggrieved or adversely affected” w/in meaning of EXPRESS review provision of statute – holder of broadcast license had standing to challenge license to another broadcaster)
-don’t have to allege legally protected interest