Maceluch v. Wysong:
a.    Plaintiffs received degrees in osteopathy and complained that they could not use “MD” behind their title, even though the degrees require similar educations and require the same licensing exam.
b.    The D.O.s felt there was a stigma without the MD title and claimed the licensing procedure was unconstitutional .
c.    Three claims: equal protection, unconstitutional, 1st amendment freedoms.
d.    HELD: there is a difference in the courses between the two degrees b/c osteopaths take courses in “manipulative therapy” and M.D.s do not.  The manipulative therapy involves a different type and approach to healing, and thus the two degrees should be distinguished.
e.    Discussion about the FMG’s and the fact that they could adopt the MD title, even though from a different training facility in a different country.  The FMG didn’t graduate from a facility giving an MD title, either.
f.    The court still allowed FMG to use MD, saying that the foreigners do not have courses in manipulative therapy, and are thus different from osteopaths.