
. Brandeis’ formulation of the “Clear and Present Danger” test requires not only imminence, but a danger that is serious. His definition of “imminence” is also stronger than Holmes’ formulation of the “Clear and Present Danger” test in Abrams because it suggests that speech must immediately incite dangerous action.
b. Like Learned Hand, Brandeis does not think a “Bad Tendency” test
alone is sufficient. He feels like it stifles too much speech.
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Supreme Court Cases and are similar to State Dave’s contribution to the Brandeis’ concurrence.. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
What's Your Answer to "State Dave’s contribution to the Brandeis’ concurrence."